The New Haven Social Studies curriculum links the teaching of skills with content. Whatever the theme of the unit, the teaching strategy pays attention to skills, especially in writing, reading in the content area, and critical thinking. The 8th grade curriculum is also becoming more and more responsible for teaching persuasive writing, a component that is tested on the CMT and in high school on the CAPT.
Elements of the unit will include opportunities for students to practice these skills. This unit could be presented in the second marking period after studying the Constitution or in the third marking period after studying westward expansion and before the Civil War.
Before moving into the units, the students also need to review what they have learned about individual rights as protected in the Constitution especially the equal protection clause
in the 14th Amendment: individual states must grant equal application of the laws to all groups giving no special protection to one class or group over another. Equal protection is addressed in the federal jurisdiction through the Fifth Amendment
where the Federal government shall not deprive any citizen of his or her "life, liberty or property without due process of law." Many of the struggles and their resolution (if any) introduced in the unit revolve around a discussion of terms: 'class', 'race', 'special group', 'separate but equal', 'segregate', 'discrimination', '
de facto', 'de jure',
'politics', 'national identity', 'immigration', 'emigration', 'alien', 'equal protection', 'provisions', 'treaty', 'Manifest Destiny', 'Hispanic', 'Latino', 'civil rights', 'due process', 'conquest', 'minority' and 'border'. The class could spend a session going over the vocabulary, or better yet, integrate vocabulary study a few words at a time as the terms appear in the lesson. Post the words on a word wall with roots and definitions; add effective phrases or sentences that illustrate the use of the word in context.
I am suggesting three larger performance tasks that could be used as the unit rather than smaller lessons. The three tasks can be modified or 'mixed and matched' to make a unit on Latino rights fit any classroom need. I would include the activity on the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
as part of any unit - it can be extended to be a stand-alone unit or included in either of Task Two or Three. The essential question can be used in any of the tasks.
Performance Tasks and Background
Performance Task One: The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
A suggested background lesson for the unit, or even a lesson that can stand separately, focuses on the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
. The National Archives has created a teaching with documents lesson that can be modified to use in any classroom
that addresses the constitutional issues as well as the content of the treaty. The primary source documents are part of the lesson. It doesn't seem necessary to reinvent the wheel when such a complete resource is available. What I would add to the lesson is a comparison between views of the treaty as seen in a US history textbook and a textbook written in Mexico in 1935 listed in the bibliography. I think the students will have a better appreciation of the Mexican point of view and acquire an understanding of Mexico as a nation that lost territory through a war. I think the students need a clear historical background in order to understand current immigration problems in California and southwest United States. Students can read and compare the source material (teacher can select an excerpt from a standard US history textbook to compare with the textbook selection), take notes, and write a persuasive essay to the imagined textbook editor of either selection, arguing how to improve the textbook entry to reflect a balanced point of view. The Mexican textbook selection contains a strong point of view, "To Mexico, the American invasion contains a terrible lesson. In this war we saw that right and justice count but little in contests between one people and another when material force and organization are wanting."
Historiography of American textbooks is a topic in itself; students can explore the American bias in old books the teacher might find on a bookshelf or in the library.
The lesson that requires students to compare textbook accounts of the design and impact of the Treaty and respond in a persuasive essay can be expanded. When the struggle for Latino rights over property and land is traced back to 1848 and traced forward through the decades, students will appreciate the long-standing civil rights struggles of Mexican Americans. The history of the treatment of Mexicans in Texas and the lands north of the 1848 border, including the late 19th and early 20th century application of Jim Crow legislation and mindset to this group of Americans is important for students to recognize.
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
was signed in February 1845 in a small city for which it was named just north of Mexico City. In the agreement worked out between representatives of President Polk and the Mexican government, Mexico lost more than half of its territories (gained from Spain with Mexican independence in 1821) to the United States: Arizona, California, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Nevada and Utah. The US was to pay $15 million in compensation. The treaty set the boundary between the two nations at the Rio Grande and added other provisions: "protection for the property and civil rights of Mexican nationals living within the new border (Articles VIII and IX), U.S. promise to police its side of the border (Article XI), and compulsory arbitration of future disputes between the two countries (Article XXI). When the U.S. Senate ratified the treaty in March, it deleted Article X guaranteeing the protection of Mexican land grants."
The treaty supposedly gave the Mexicans who decided to remain north of the border the rights of citizens including protections of "property, culture and religion." The protections were only as strong as those willing to defend them. The Gadsden Treaty of 1853 promised the same protections for Mexicans who opted to remain in the additional territory acquired by the US in what is today southern Arizona in 1854. In reality, as white settlers moved into the new lands, with squatter's rights on vacant lands protected under the 1862 Homestead Act, and English language courts deciding in favor of whites, Mexicans were driven from their lands.
Students could investigate the meaning of "Manifest Destiny" by reading the primary document that shaped its impact. John L. Sullivan first wrote about the rationale for America to grow in an 1839 article
; his expanded thoughts in 1845 editorial coined the phrase that became the slogan for westward expansion.
".... the right of our manifest destiny to over spread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty and federal development of self government entrusted to us. It is right such as that of the tree to the space of air and the earth suitable for the full expansion of its principle and destiny of growth."
In the lesson, students can read a primary document that reveals the outrage and injustice of the violations of the treaty provisions. The reading also gives a clearer picture of the historical connection of Mexicans with the lands of the southwest United States as their homelands. Don Pablo de la Guerra, a well-respected
was one of the representatives at the 1849 Monterey Constitutional Convention, which wrote the California constitution (statehood was granted in the Compromise of 1850). He argued for the rights of Mexicans, including the right to vote. In 1856 his speech to the California legislature about land rights captures the feelings that many Mexicans must have shared at the time:
are the conquered who lay prostrate before the conqueror and ask for the protection in the enjoyment of the little which their fortune has left them. They are the ones who had been sold like sheep--those who were abandoned and sold by Mexico. They do not understand the language which is now spoken in their own country….I have seen old men of sixty and seventy years of age weeping like children because they have been cast out of their ancestral home. They have been humiliated and insulted…You Senators do not listen to the complaints of the Spanish citizens. You do not sufficiently appreciate their land titles and the just right to their possessions."
Latino civil rights struggles have a long history. Historical perspective is important and I think a survey on American history needs to look at this 'conquest' of Mexican lands and the violation of the promises made to its people. In 1960, Reies Lopez Tijerina began a militant organization the
Alianza Federal de las Mercedes
(Federal Land Grant Alliance), to challenge the loss of property in violation of the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
. In 2000, after considerable lobbying, Senate Bill Number 2022 was introduced questioning whether or not the United States had fulfilled its obligations under the treaty. The bill is designed to 'remedy lingering injustice' but at no time are property rights of any citizens to be challenged.
The lesson on the treaty can also be extended into a bigger project that compares Mexican, Native American and African American efforts over land rights and reparations.
Performance Task Two: Latino Civil Rights Struggles
I will present this task in much the same way I would introduce it in the classroom. Students will begin the project individually and then quickly move to work in cooperative groups. This task focuses on Latino Civil Rights struggles but could easily be adapted to include other groups who struggle for civil rights in America even to this day.
Each student will be given a worksheet with seven very short scenarios that present a problem. Students will be asked to give a short response to one or two questions that follow each scenario; there are no wrong answers. Teacher will collect the sheets and the class will talk about their immediate reactions to the scenarios before continuing with the activity.
1. Imagine yourself arriving in America in the early part of the twentieth century. You are from Puerto Rico, a territory of the United States, but when you arrive in New York you are detained and held at Ellis Island as an alien. Do you think you should be allowed into the United States? Are you a citizen of the United States?
2. Your culture is Mexican but your children are American-born and you live in southern California. Imagine that it is 1931, the winter semester is beginning and your children are returning to the public school in your city. When you drop the children off, you are told to take them to a smaller school in another location. Should you refuse to go? Why can the school board send your children to another school?
3. You are the lawyer for a young Mexican American (?) man in Texas who has been legally convicted of murder by a jury who listened to all the evidence. According to the Constitution a jury must be impartial - in other words, a jury should be composed of peers of the accused. As the trial begins, you tell your client that no one in the jury is Mexican American, and in fact, every jury member is "Anglo". Do you think your client was able to receive a fair and impartial trial?
4. The Supreme Court overturned idea of 'separate but equal' in the historic 1954 case
Brown v. Board of Education
. School boards were directed that setting up separate public schools for black and white children was unconstitutional. Your Latino family hopes to send your children to a public school in Texas. Do you think your children will attend a similarly integrated school?
5. The year is 1889. Your family has owned
Rancho Las Virgenes,
a ranch in the region of Los Angeles, California since 1834, long before California was ceded to the United States by Mexico. You hold title to the land and your documents are legal in the Mexican courts; but, you failed to transfer your documents for American recognition when the land became part of the United States. After gold is discovered in California, and pioneers move west looking for farmland, a homesteader moves on to your land, claims it as his, and takes you to court. Whose land is it?
6. Your Spanish-speaking children have moved with you from Puerto Rico to your new home in New York City. Your son and daughter are excited about beginning kindergarten and second grade in this new home. On the first day of school the children return home in tears because they didn't understand anything said in any of the classrooms because everyone spoke English all the time. You were told that teaching in the Spanish language was not required in public schools. Do you think this is a good idea? What is the school's responsibility?
7. You and hundreds of hard-working people just like you cross the Texas border legally every day to work your day job in the early twentieth century. U.S. government officials tell you that you might be carrying lice or bringing other health hazards with you across the border. You are required to bathe in a toxic chemical on a weekly basis before being allowed to go to work. Is this a fair requirement? Do you have any way to protest this requirement? Should you?
After the class has discussed the scenarios and initial student responses, divide the class into groups of four or five students. Return the student scenario sheets to the students and give each group a print out of the short summaries (see below) and ask them to identify which scenario goes with each actual event. Have the students compare their original answers to the information in the summaries and talk about what they learned. The class should meet again as a whole to discuss the events in the summaries.
Next, the student groups will each research one of the events in greater detail and present their findings to the class. Teachers can follow any research strategy including the Big 6 format.
Students will need to discover how the Constitution and/or the Amendments relate to the event and use the details to support a response to the essential question-
how does a document written in the past touch the lives of people in the present?
Students can present their research in any form as directed by the teacher.
1. GONZALES v. WILLIAMS, 192 U.S. 1 (1904) Isabel Gonzalez arrived in New York City and was held at Ellis Island as an "alien immigrant" by the Commissioner of Immigration. After the Spanish American War, Puerto Rico was ceded to the United States and its citizens transferred allegiance to the United States. The Supreme Court, in deciding the Gonzalez case, relied on its reading of the Act of April 12, 1900 which formed a civil government in Puerto Rico. Puerto Ricans were not (as yet) citizens of the United States, but were citizens of Puerto Rico, now a territory of the United States to which they owed allegiance: they were entitled to protections coming from being under the jurisdiction of the United States. As such, a person entering the United States from Puerto Rico was not a passenger from a foreign port. The Supreme Court decision stated "Puerto Ricans are not aliens" and Miss Gonzalez was discharged from Ellis Island.
Connection to Constitution: Teacher can encourage students to look at the role of the circuit court and habeas corpus and the appeals process. Students should look at the Supreme Court - where is it described in the Constitution? How does it affect the lives of individuals? Who are citizens of the United States and what are the protections of citizens versus foreign visitors (aliens).
2. Roberto Alvarez vs. the Board of Trustees of the Lemon Grove School DISTRICT Of the 169 children in Lemon Grove Grammar School, 75 students were American-born children of Mexican parents. As the January school session began, the school principal refused these children entry into the school and instructed them to go to their school - a hastily built shanty that everyone descriptively called "La Caballeriza" (the barnyard) - that would isolate the children into a two room school house of their own. In the court case that followed, the school board argued that the children needed to be 'Americanized' and learn English. Parents and the Mexican community rallied to protest this action and took the school board to court for building a separate school. The case was decided in favor of the Mexican families, the judge stated that the Mexican children if segregated, could not learn English because they would be denied the presence of American children in the classroom. The children were returned to their original school and the Lemon Grove Board of Education never appealed the verdict.
Connection to Constitution: This case is often seen as a backdrop to
Brown v. Board of Education.
Students can look at the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment since the school board was operating within the state of California. Students need to look at the social realities of the time including the deportation of many Mexicans who rallied to support this case; the children are citizens and therefore should be protected by the Constitution. What if the students were not citizens? Would they have any protections?
3. HERN¡NDEZ V. STATE OF TEXAS. In 1950, a migrant field worker named Pete Hernandez was found guilty of murdering Joe Espinosa in Edna, Texas. His lawyer, Gustavo Garcia, anticipated correctly that the verdict would be upheld at the Texas Court of Appeals level. Mr. Garcia targeted the case as an opportunity to challenge the long-standing practice of excluding Mexican Americans from serving on juries in the state of Texas. The State of Texas argued that the 14th Amendment applied to blacks and whites and that Mexicans were white - therefore there was no problem. Mr. Garcia argued that Mexican Americans were being treated as a 'class apart' and as such were denied equal application of the law. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the unanimous decision that reversed the murder verdict, and freed Mr. Hernandez in 1954. A distinction between Hispanic and white as separate groups was accepted under the 'class apart' interpretation, because the distinction revealed clear violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
Connection to Constitution: The case directly appeals to the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Note the date (1954) and the Chief Justice (Earl Warren) - students can make comparisons with the thinking behind the decision of
Brown v. Board of Education
and the reversal of 'separate but equal' long accepted as judicial precedent since
Plessy v. Ferguson
. Students might evaluate the irony of letting a murderer go free in order to gain a wider protection of individual rights. Would the family of the victim agree?
4. CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. v. CISNEROS , 404 U.S. 1211 (1971) In 1970, the school system in Corpus Christi Texas bused white children to new schools, hired black and Latino teachers for black and Latino schools, never bused black and Latino children into integrated schools, and in fact, set up a dual school system for Mexican, African American and white children. Twenty-five parents and Jose Cisneros sued the Corpus Christi school district challenging the argument that the schools were integrated because Latinos (other-whites) were integrated in the black schools. The facilities at these schools were shameful. The district court judge 'relied primarily on the application of unconstitutional segregation of Mexican Americans as an identifiable minority group based on physical, cultural, religious, and linguistic distinctions'
to decide the case. A later case,
Keyes, et al v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado 1973,
directly challenged the practice of integrating black and Latino children to fulfill requirements of desegregation. The school system was forced to end the practice; when Corpus Christi school officials 'dragged their feet', the court stepped in to require compliance.
Connection to Constitution: The 14th Amendment is the basis of this case although students can see an evolution in the thinking of the court if they look at Hernandez and Keyes cases. In 1975, the school district was forced to act on the judgment: students might look into how the school system improved and see a connection between court decision and their impact on social change.
5. BOTILLER v. DOMINGUEZ, 130 U.S. 238, 1889. Nemecio Dominguez and Domingo Carrillo, living in their homeland of California, Mexico, were given title to a tract of land near the Los Angeles area in 1834. In 1846, Mexico and the United States fought each other in the Mexican-American war, ending in 1848 with the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.
The territories of California, along with regions of the southwest including much of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Utah were ceded to the United States. The treaty contained language promising to respect the land holdings of Mexicans living in the ceded areas. In 1851, a California law required landowners with Mexican land titles to present their deeds to the state for confirmation or risk forfeiture. The California state court, in
Minturn v Brower
(1864), ruled that such forfeitures should be considered illegal and the long standing Mexican land titles were upheld even if the owners hadn't brought them forward. After the Homestead Acts were passed in the 1860s, Brigido Botiller and others occupied portions of the Dominguez ranch and claimed title. The California Court upheld the Dominguez title to the land relying on the decision of
Minturn v Brower
. The case went to the US Supreme Court where it was overturned. The court reaffirmed the 1851 legislation that interpreted the terms of the
Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
and required presentation of Mexican land deeds to California Courts for confirmation. The Dominguez family lost their claim.
Connection to Constitution: The case is useful for showing how the court system works - how cases move through the courts and how courts refer to earlier decisions. As far as a protection of individual rights, the court avoided the issue by directing the California court to look at the treaty (which is Congressional jurisdiction) and follow its specifications. The property clause of the 5th Amendment has been historically used to protect property in federal cases - why wasn't the Amendment applied in this case? Consider the context of the case and the settlement of California after statehood (1850).
6. Aspira v. New York City Board of Education
1974. Parents of Spanish speaking children sought the help of Aspira, a Puerto Rican youth education organization in New York City to find a way to force New York City schools to pay attention to the non-native student population. There were no bilingual education classes or teachers who instructed in Spanish or other languages. With the help of the newly formed Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, parents sued the school system in Federal Court. Legislation did exist to prevent discrimination: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 required school boards to provide equal education opportunity for its minority language students and The Bilingual Education Act that followed in 1968 reinforced the legislation. The judge issued a "consent decree" (a voluntary agreement between the parties especially when it seems the defendant's actions are illegal) that required the school system to hire Spanish speaking teachers and expand bilingual education. The
case set a precedent that is still in use in court cases today in cases involving bilingual education issues.
Connection to Constitution: Students can look at how civil rights organizations such as the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, make it possible to bring civil rights cases to the courts for people who can't do it on their own. This case is still used as precedent to support bilingual education. In contrast, in 1998 California voters chose to end the bilingual education program in the state's public schools. Spanish speaking children were 'immersed' in English language classes under the theory (supported by the voters) that bilingual education doesn't work. Students might explore this issue and the heated debate that continues about bilingual education throughout the country. Students might also look at the 2006 controversy about the promotion of a Spanish language version of the Star Spangled Banner. Does an American have freedom of speech only if the speech is in English?
7. Carmelita Torres and the Bath House Riots 1917 Miss Carmelita Torres age 17, came from Juarez Mexico to clean houses in El Paso, Texas. When she crossed the border, she and hundreds of men and women like her, were forced to bathe and be disinfected in a building set aside for the purpose. Men and women were forced to hand their clothes over to be steam cleaned; bathe, be inspected for lice, and disinfected with gasoline. This treatment happened on a regular schedule until the day Miss Torres urged 30 others to join her in protesting the humiliating requirement. The protest developed into a riot when confrontations occurred between the Mexican workers and the El Paso officials and onlookers. In the end, nothing was done to stop the practice until years later when the Board of Health determined the chemicals used were toxic and dangerous, and the practice stopped.
Connection to Constitution: I think the students could compare the protest in El Paso to the actions of Rosa Parks - since the connection has already been made in many references. What happened after Rosa Parks refused to sit at the back of the bus
what happened to this young woman who refused to be disinfected? Miss Torres was not a citizen; is she still protected by the Constitution? What happened in the fifty odd years between the bath house riots and the bus boycott that caused one event to be ignored and the other to change American society?
Performance Task Three: Decades of Civil Rights Struggles
This project needed to be expanded from the customary design that I used for years to include names and events that represent the struggles for Civil Rights by members of the Latino community. The original intent of this Yale unit was to expand the topics for the Constitution through the 'decades' project that I already use in the classroom.
The 'Decades of Civil Rights Struggles' task asks students to look at the actual application of rights from the Constitution and appreciate how this document written so long ago continues to protect individual rights. The cases and events summarized above in Performance Task Two can be added to a list of significant names and events for the students to investigate. I limit topics to the twentieth century but a teacher could use any time period. Students first work in small groups to identify and describe six examples of civil rights struggles or events in which the Constitution played a part, one event for a decade. They can choose which decades to research. There are many books and online sources that provide topics and context by decade; students should have no trouble finding a person or event to relate to the Constitution. In some years, students have stretched the application of the Constitution to research their favorite rap stars using the rationale that without the First Amendment these singers would not be allowed to say what they say in their songs. After the students have a general factual knowledge about six people or events, (or fewer if the assignment needs to be modified), they share their discoveries with the class so that everyone learns about new people or events of the 20th century. In all cases the students must say how the Constitution (the document from the past that still touches our lives today) is involved. The task can end here or the teacher can extend it and have students research one of the people or events more thoroughly. The class could create a timeline of civil rights events for classroom display after learning about individual topics.
New Haven Social Studies Standards
The New Haven Social Studies standards reflect the state standards but are organized around five themes or strands -- diversity, civics/government, geography, economics and history--whereas the state uses fourteen.
The standards that are aligned with my unit come from the Grade 8 framework. The unit can be integrated into the third marking period when students study Manifest Destiny and territorial expansion; the unit also can be integrated into a civics study of Civil Rights and the courts.
1.1 Read, view and listen to multiple sources that reflect the diversity of culture
1.5 Identify the impact of the Constitution on the world today.
1.8 Analyze why immigrants came to America and the problems they encountered.
2.7 Describe how one becomes a citizen of the United States.
2.8 Investigate the goals and struggles of minority groups in America.
3.4 Investigate the westward expansion.
3.5 Discuss the impact of immigrants on America since 1880.
5.5 Examine the development of the Constitution of the United States.